by Jenny Mae Vansteenlandt and Anneleen Wydooghe
The transition to a climate-neutral economy is well underway. The European Commission aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 90% by 2040 (reference year: 1990). Decarbonisation, or CO₂ reduction in business operations, encourages companies to fundamentally rethink how they produce, consume and create value. It’s not just about regulations such as CSRD, ETS and CBAM - it’s about forward-looking leadership. In a world where customers, governments and investors expect more than ever, CO₂ reduction is both a strategic choice and a societal responsibility. The question is not if you will take action, but how your organisation will put this into practice.
The first step towards decarbonisation is gaining insight. By measuring your organisation’s carbon footprint, you identify where the greatest levers for reduction lie. In doing so, you distinguish between three emission categories:
Scope 1: direct emissions from owned or controlled sources (e.g. combustion in owned installations, emissions from company vehicles)
Scope 2: indirect emissions from purchased energy (e.g. electricity, heat generated externally)
Scope 3: all other indirect emissions in the value chain (e.g. supply chain, transport, purchased goods and services, commuting, use of sold products)
A baseline measurement of your carbon footprint provides the foundation. But measurement alone isn’t enough. Only when you understand where the risks and opportunities lie can you develop a thoughtful and realistic reduction plan.
Measuring helps you get a grip on the numbers. But it’s only through risk and opportunity analysis that you gain true strategic insight. Ask yourself:
Is your organisation exposed to rising carbon prices?
Does inaction on climate policy pose a reputational risk?
Are there procurement requirements or customer demands you need to meet?
A thorough risk and opportunity analysis requires input from multiple departments, such as finance, operations and legal. This creates not just shared awareness, but also a sense of urgency. That is crucial to build support for change and to ensure long-term stability and growth.
After the baseline measurement and analysis, it’s time to create a plan. A robust CO₂ reduction plan aligns with the organisation’s strategic choices. Think of investment decisions at board level, operational decisions at site level, discussions with investors and a review of the procurement strategy.
A credible plan not only focuses on meeting European targets - halving emissions by 2030 and climate neutrality by 2050 - but also takes into account what is realistic within the organisation’s context. That means daring to prioritise, to delay certain measures, and to revise others when necessary. By explicitly stating which measures are feasible and which are (still) not, you avoid CO₂ reduction becoming just a wish list without follow-through.
Phased electrification: full electrification of the vehicle fleet is delayed due to lack of charging infrastructure and too great an impact on operational planning. In the meantime, the organisation focuses on route optimisation and fuel efficiency. Electrification starts in year two.
Postponement of a solar park: high interest costs and limited grid capacity mean the investment in an own solar park is temporarily postponed. In the meantime, the organisation purchases green electricity from an external supplier.
A strong reduction plan recognises limitations, but seizes what is possible.
Decarbonisation is rarely a linear path, don’t expect your emissions to fall evenly year after year. In practice, decarbonisation is a learning process that requires flexibility and an open mindset.
As your organisation and the experts involved mature, the plan evolves too:
scope 3 is expanded with new and more refined data;
assumptions are adjusted;
objectives are sharpened or revised.
The process is dynamic and depends on economic conditions, technical feasibility and available budgets. Learning and adjusting are part of sustainable progress.
A strong transition plan doesn’t live in an Excel file or a OneDrive folder. It’s embedded at the core of your organisation:
integrated into financial and governance processes;
linked to investment plans;
assigned to data owners;
managed via a protocol for updates and version control.
Employees change and structures evolve, but the quality, continuity and transparency of your data and transition plan must remain intact and continue to improve, even as the context changes.
Do your projects contribute measurably to greenhouse gas emission reductions? Subsidies, such as those from the Helios Foundation, support companies that take concrete steps towards decarbonisation. Think of technological innovation, process optimisation, circular economy initiatives or new business models. Subsidies are a means to accelerate action, not the starting point. They strengthen what you as an organisation are already determined to achieve.
Do you have questions about carbon measurements or strategic choices? We are happy to help.
This form can only be sent with the use of technical cookies. You can accept these cookies here.
These cookies are used to distinguish people from bots. Certain data, such as your IP address or language preference, can be sent to Google. More information in our cookie policy.
Jenny Mae Vansteenlandt
Anneleen Wydooghe
Team Manager Sustainability anneleen.wydooghe@vdl.be
Disclaimer
In our opinions, we rely on current legislation, interpretations and legal doctrine. This does not prevent the administration from disputing them or from changing existing interpretations.
Read our latest insights and news releases to stay abreast of changes in your industry.